Demystifying interoperability: Key takeaways from our new white paper
Government offices are filled with siloed, sector-specific digital systems that strain their capacity to make decisions, use data effectively, and achieve ambitious sustainable development goals. Public investments in digital development, transformation, and infrastructure can only meet citizen needs if data and systems are consolidated and interoperable.
While interoperability is a sensible approach to building digital public infrastructure, transforming existing systems is easier said than done. Limited resources and expertise, lack of training, inadequate hardware and software infrastructure, and concerns over data privacy are some of the key factors that limit the impact of systems or lead to their discontinuation. The data that feeds these systems also needs to be standardized using global best practices and common languages and frameworks that can be understood across multiple platforms and adapted to the local context. In increasingly digital economies, systems and their data need to be relevant and responsive to citizens’ specific conditions and needs With emerging challenges like climate change that require more complex data, and new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) that require large volumes of data, systems need to be agile and scalable to advance solutions and fully harness innovation.
Our latest paper discusses, in practical terms, what goes into implementing interoperable solutions in partnership with public administrations. Based on over 20 years of DG’s experience, the paper demystifies key components needed to build robust, resilient, and interoperable data systems, focusing on the “how” of data standardization, data governance, and implementing technical infrastructure.
Setting up Data Standards
Data must be standardized for consistent and seamless exchange between different systems. Without standardization, systems cannot “talk” to one another, limiting users’ ability to gain deeper insights from combined data sources. Standardization can be a long process as not all data can be acted upon at once; certain datasets and systems need to be prioritized with a view to scale over time. Moreover, data standards are about the people who use them: it takes time for the people who know their data best to change data collection and usage methods over time. Inclusive data standards processes draw diverse stakeholders together for a win-win scenario: everybody can make better decisions that drive productivity when they can see the same picture together.
Cultivating Adaptable Data Governance
Many countries do not have a clear “whole-of-government” policy on data sharing and access. This absence matters for interoperability because systems will struggle to remain usable without a consistent flow of quality data that can be shared. To tackle this challenge, Chapter 3 looks at the practical and legal frameworks that govern how key digital systems in the Ethiopian Ministry of Agriculture manage and control data availability, usability, integrity/quality, and security. Incorporating a data governance lens into the technical development of systems increases data accuracy and consistency by taking the guesswork out of data sharing.
Building Up the Technology
What counts as “good” digital public infrastructure is hard to define, especially when there are several well-known problems. For example, there are systems that cannot be modified without re-engaging vendor support; platforms with rapidly outdated technology; and difficult-to-manage storage solutions that lead to data loss. Smart development of digital infrastructure boosts efficiency and builds trust, making services more responsive to citizen needs. Solving these challenges requires a holistic approach that addresses software, hardware, and local IT infrastructure and capacity.
Recommendations
One program cannot address all problems! The following recommendations reflect the systemic shifts required to build better technology across sectors as well as the forward-looking opportunities that set up public technology for the future.
- View digital transformation on a maturity axis, rather than a transition from point A to B.
- Understand what already exists to set priorities.
- Use what exists to define the scope.
- Institutionalize sustainability from the outset in every dimension: human, institutional, technical, and financial.
- Take a portfolio view of digital transformation that puts interoperability at the center. Country digital roadmaps can guide priorities across multiple digital needs.
- Recognize that transformation requires champions.
- Ensure data standards stretch across sectors and regions.
- Keep watching and actively collaborating with telecommunications outfits as the numbers of local cloud providers continue to grow.
- Invest in national legal frameworks for responsible data sharing.
- Do not forget the people.
More Smoke, More Stroke
In honor of this year’s World Stroke Day, observed annually on October 29th, this piece aims to raise awareness of the substantial burden of non-communicable diseases–particularly stroke incidents–using the case study of Nigeria, one of the main tobacco production hubs on the continent, in addition to Kenya.
New Research Manuscript on Mortality from Tobacco Use in Kenya
DG is excited to announce the publication of a research manuscript on Mortality from Tobacco Use in Kenya in Tobacco-Induced Diseases. This research was carried out as part of the Tobacco Control Data Initiative (TCDI).
Mythbusters: Digital Public Infrastructure & Digital Public Goods
Although the international community has just now reached consensus on what digital public infrastructure is, there are still a lot of myths and misperceptions around the term, and the open-source technology that often powers it. In this blog, we’ll debunk some common myths we hear about DPI with facts, highlight some successes and failures, and show you some of the open-source DPI tools we’re following.