Open Data for Development Camp highlights challenges and innovations in aid transparency
The Open Data for Development Camp (ODDC), hosted by Open for Change in Amsterdam from May 12-13, proved to be a fantastic forum for discussion of practical issues in institutionalizing open data practices. Participants generally agreed that open development data should be a core component of a paradigm shift towards increased transparency, accountability, and public participation in development practice. However, many organizations are facing legal and financial hurdles in bringing sensitive data to the public – several delegates, for example, expressed concern that data would be “misused”. Christian Kreutz of the Open Knowledge Foundation highlighted the benefits of open data and geo-mapping for citizen participation, but also urged consideration of privacy issues before making certain data public. Others echoed the Italian government’s concerns about the cost of implementing open data initiatives.
These concerns do not preclude donors’ ability to implement open data initiatives – rather they indicate donors’ willingness to discuss the full risks and benefits of these initiatives. As the recent ONE Data report pointed out, “buy-in and agreement [on open data] appear to be increasing in the run-up to the Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness.” According to Publish What You Fund, donors should be wary of falling behind on their commitments to initiatives like the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) if they want to be taken seriously at this important forum.
Beyond challenges and difficulties, delegates to ODDC also presented exciting new open data initiatives. Akvo, for example, announced a pilot project with the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs to visualize part of its portfolio of aid projects online in IATI standard format (Pieter Dorst, director of aid coordination at the Dutch MFA, confirmed his government’s commitment to IATI in an interview with Akvo last Thursday). The World Bank announced a new knowledge partnership on ICT, through which they will invite technology start-ups, developers, think-tanks, and academics to partner with the WB in using ICT to empower citizens in developing countries. AidData (a joint initiative of Development Gateway, the College of William and Mary, and Brigham Young University) presented its experience geo-coding development aid projects.
Those interested in open data issues beyond the international development arena may be interested in an upcoming event: the Open Knowledge Foundation’s annual conference, to be held from June 30-July 1, 2011.
Share This Post
Related from our library
Building a Sustainable Cashew Sector in West Africa Through Data and Collaboration
Cashew-IN project came to an end in August 2024 after four years of working with government agencies, producers, traders, processors, and development partners in the five implementing countries to co-create an online tool aimed to inform, support, promote, and strengthen Africa’s cashew industry. This blog outlines some of the key project highlights, including some of the challenges we faced, lessons learned, success stories, and identified opportunities for a more competitive cashew sector in West Africa.
Digital Transformation for Public Value: Development Gateway’s Insights from Agriculture & Open Contracting
In today’s fast-evolving world, governments and public organizations are under more pressure than ever before to deliver efficient, transparent services that align with public expectations. In this blog, we delve into the key concepts behind digital transformation and how it can enhance public value by promoting transparency, informing policy, and supporting evidence-based decision-making.
From Data Gaps to Impact: Key Insights from the VIFAA Program
Over the last six years, DG, together with its partners AfricaFertilizer (AFO) and Wallace & Associates, collaborated to implement the Visualizing Insights on Fertilizer for African Agriculture (VIFAA) Program. In the program’s final year (2024), the team undertook a “program learning process” to reflect on outcomes, challenges, and successes through internal interviews. This blog captures five key learnings, which we hope will guide similar programs aiming to bridge data gaps in agricultural development.