A World that Counts vs. A World that Hides
The Secretary-General’s Independent Expert Advisory Group on a Data Revolution has released their report, A World that Counts: Mobilising the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development, which outlines how to enact the data revolution into the Sustainable Development Goals. In true MDG/SDG global goal setting fashion the report proposes a “Global Consensus on Data,” a “Network of Data Innovation Networks,” a UN-led “Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data,” and an “SDGs data lab.”
While all positive steps, I feel the most important part was the one that didn’t receive any sort of catchy network/partnership/group, improving the capacity of stakeholders within governments and organizations to be able to gather, display, analyze, and integrate data themselves which would spur economic growth, enable data based decision making where it is most important, start to decrease that inequality the report talks about while achieving the rest of the goals the report lays out.
Interestingly enough, Mark Malloch Brown, former UN Deputy Secretary General, who helped draft the MDGs said recently that the goals were meant as a way to measure success in serving the poor, “not the prescription for spending western aid that they became.”
He goes on to focus on the importance of building an “empowered but regulated private sector” for true development to take place. Transparency International would highlight the need for these countries to be transparent in order to fight corruption. Their recently released report, Transparency in Corporate Reporting, notes the lackluster effort most companies are putting into being more transparent.
And we all agree how important transparency is. A guest post on Oxfam’s From Poverty to Power blog noted the resounding AMEN to four critical principles for development-accountability, transparency, participation, and inclusion. However, what these mean in action can be drastically different depending on what point of view we are coming from. The authors note that a stronger consensus will likely determine the success of truly integrating these principles into development.
Image from United Nations Photo, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
This piece was originally published on AidData’s The First Tranche.
Share This Post
Related from our library
Diving into the DaYTA Program’s Data Collection Process
This blog explores key insights from the DaYTA program, offering practical guidance for researchers on effective data collection, overcoming field challenges, and leveraging local partnerships to enhance tobacco control efforts. This piece is especially timely following DaYTA’s workshop convening all 3 study country stakeholders to review the survey results and strategize on how best to disseminate this data to target audiences. This workshop took place from in Lagos, Nigeria, from November 18-20th.
New Research Manuscript on Mortality from Tobacco Use in Kenya
DG is excited to announce the publication of a research manuscript on Mortality from Tobacco Use in Kenya in Tobacco-Induced Diseases. This research was carried out as part of the Tobacco Control Data Initiative (TCDI).
At a Glance | Evidence-Informed Policymaking: Education Data-Driven Decision Mapping in Kenya and Senegal
Development Gateway: An IREX Venture (DG) and our strategic partner IREX, supported by the William & Flora Hewlett Foundation, conducted a study of the education data systems in Kenya and Senegal. In our findings from this study, we underscore the necessity of a harmonized approach to education data management and share insights that provide a valuable roadmap for future reforms and investments in education data systems.