Reliable, accessible data is essential for effective tobacco control, enabling policymakers to implement stronger, evidence-based responses to evolving industry tactics and public health challenges. As spotlighted by this year’s World No Tobacco Day, themed “Unmasking the Appeal: Exposing Industry Tactics on Tobacco and Nicotine Products,” the tobacco industry continues to market its products, especially to youth, through increasingly deceptive strategies. 

In support of stronger, data-driven policy responses, Development Gateway’s (DG) Tobacco Control Data Initiative (TCDI), launched in 2019 with funding from the Gates Foundation, developed country-specific websites for Kenya, Nigeria, Zambia, South Africa, Ethiopia, and the DRC. These platforms centralize trustworthy, reliable data on topics ranging from taxation and illicit trade to health burden and industry interference. 

Complementing this work, DG’s Data on Youth and Tobacco in Africa (DaYTA) program, which began in 2023, focuses on filling knowledge gaps around tobacco use among 10- to 17-year-olds in Kenya, Nigeria, and the DRC. Together, these initiatives support ongoing efforts across sub-Saharan Africa to counter industry influence and strengthen tobacco control. This blog shares key research findings on tobacco industry interference from TCDI-focus countries.

Unmasking the Appeal: How Tobacco Industry Strategies Hinder Effective Tobacco Control in Africa 

Across Africa, the tobacco industry continues to employ various strategies aimed at maintaining a favorable operating environment and expanding its customer base. As a profit-driven sector, its approaches often include efforts to influence public perception, delay the implementation of health regulations, or frame its activities in ways that minimize perceived harm. Such practices can complicate policy development and slow the adoption of effective tobacco control measures, posing significant challenges to public health progress.

In Nigeria, for instance, the British American Tobacco Nigeria (BATN) Foundation targets National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members through agricultural entrepreneurship initiatives, such as the Farmers for the Future Grant and the Graduate Agripreneur Program, reflecting a major tactic the industry uses to deflect attention from the harms of its products. 

In Zambia, the Centre for Primary Care Research (CPCR), one of TCDI’s implementing partners, revealed several alarming strategies used by the industry to attract young people to tobacco and nicotine products. In their report “Big Tobacco, Tiny Targets”, published in March  2025, researchers discovered that at least one type of tobacco product was available for purchase in 99% of points of sale (POS) located within 100 meters of schools and playgrounds. In over half of these POS, flavoured cigarettes were available for purchase. 

To address these realities, generating reliable, evidence-based insights is crucial in equipping public health actors with the tools needed to critically evaluate industry claims, counter misinformation, and advocate for stronger, more resilient policy and legislative frameworks.

Between April and June 2024, DaYTA conducted a household-based, nationally representative survey that shed light on the reasons for initiating use of tobacco and nicotine products amongst adolescents, as well as the widespread exposure they face through both digital and in-person advertising and promotional channels. The following infographics highlight some of these key insights:

Strengthening Tobacco Control in Zambia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo

In light of the industry’s persistent efforts to obstruct tobacco control, TCDI developed dedicated industry interference pages tailored to each focus country, which compile and analyze common arguments used by the industry. These resources are designed to provide stakeholders with a deeper understanding of industry tactics and support countermeasures rooted in evidence. Timely, context-specific information on these strategies is vital for tobacco control advocates to effectively monitor, expose, and counter industry influence.

As part of TCDI’s primary research across the six focus countries, teams in the DRC and Zambia investigated the prevalence of illicit cigarette trade, a significant barrier to effective tobacco control on both the enforcement and implementation fronts. In 2022, the Zambia study found that 12.2% of over 118,000 discarded packs analyzed were illicit, lacking Zambia Revenue Authority tax stamps, required health warnings, or bearing duty-free labels despite being sold openly. Of particular concern, 10.1% of packs lacked a ZRA stamp, indicating a significant loss of government tax revenue. A summary of the study is available here.

In 2023, 8.6% of the cigarette market in DRC was found to be illicit, surging to over 51% if all imported yellow-stamped packs were included, according to the study. To support enforcement efforts, the team trained 26 provincial health inspectors, one from each province, on both the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and the survey’s key findings. Consequently, during this year’s WNTD, the DRC’s Minister of Health, Dr. Roger Kamba, joined forces with civil society to lead a public march to the National Assembly, where they delivered a formal memorandum urging lawmakers to ratify the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products, the first protocol under the WHO FCTC and an independent international treaty designed to combat illicit tobacco trade worldwide.

This primary research represents a critical path forward in generating local evidence to guide policy, offering the most precise picture yet of illicit tobacco trade in Zambia and the DRC. It underscores the urgent need for enhanced border control, better regulation of tobacco distribution, and effective systems to track and trace these products

From Evidence to Action: How Our Stakeholders Are Harnessing TCDI Data to Counter Industry Interference

In Nigeria, the Kano Hadaka Development Initiative (KAHADI), one of TCDI’s civil society partners, has effectively leveraged data from the TCDI website to counter tobacco industry interference through a strategic, multi-pronged approach. By utilizing the platform’s robust insights, KAHADI has pinpointed high-risk populations and designed targeted interventions to reduce tobacco use. The data has also bolstered their advocacy work, equipping them to push for meaningful policy reforms across different levels of government. Guided by findings from the Nigeria portal, KAHADI has launched public awareness campaigns to educate communities on tobacco’s harms while partnering with healthcare providers, educators, and local leaders to broaden their reach and deepen impact.

Highlighting the platform’s accessibility, Suleima Aliyi, KAHADI’s Secretary, said, “The TCDI dashboard is our go-to resource for tracking tobacco use trends. It directly informs the proposals and policy recommendations we develop for government stakeholders. We’ve been able to draft multiple proposals to the Kano State Government, and we’re now preparing for a final policy meeting with the Governor.”

Building on this, Zambia’s experience highlights how data is being used across contexts to support tobacco control. Ahead of an internal legislative committee meeting, the Zambia Ministry of Health and its civil society partners conducted a strategic review of the bill’s most contentious provisions, drawing on data from the TCDI dashboards to pre-empt and counter industry arguments. To challenge claims that graphic health warnings (GHWs) are impractical, the team cited the South Africa dashboard, which features an infographic illustrating the widespread adoption of GHWs across the continent. Similarly, in anticipation of pushback around illicit trade, they referenced the Kenya dashboard to demonstrate how robust enforcement tools such as track-and-trace systems can effectively curb illicit tobacco flows.

In a July 2025 interview conducted by the TCDI Ethiopia team, Bitsat Shimeles, Senior Expert at the Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances & Tobacco Desk of Ethiopia’s Food and Drug Administration, highlighted how the industry interference page plays a vital role in supporting the government’s mitigation efforts.

Evidence across the TCDI countries points to several core priority actions for countering influence from the industry: 

1. Enact or fully enforce comprehensive legislation
2. Ban/prohibit manipulative tobacco-funded CSR activities
3. Establish clear codes of conduct for public officials 
4. Embrace transparency measures  by mandating disclosures of all interactions with the industry and adopting more rigid conflict of interest policies 
5. Empower civil society to monitor interference and accountability, for both the government and industry alike.

With growing recognition of the need to address industry interference and enforce tobacco control laws, data-driven strategies, such as those supported through TCDI,  underscore the value of accessible, reliable evidence that can be adapted and shared across countries facing similar tobacco control challenges.

When we discuss food systems, we are not just talking about farms; we are referring to the entire food supply chain. We are talking about how people eat, live, and navigate an increasingly volatile climate. 

The upcoming 2025 UN Food Systems Stocktaking Moment (UNFSS+4) provides a global platform to take stock of this complexity, and Ethiopia’s role as host is significant, offering a concrete case study to assess progress not only in policy but also in the lived realities of farmers, students, researchers, and urban households. While Ethiopia’s experience is specific, the challenges and innovations it reveals are common across many low- and middle-income countries.

This blog post analyzes Ethiopia’s national food systems strategy as an example of where the UNFSS can go next in strengthening global food security.

What People Often Miss About Food Systems

Food systems are often misunderstood as being limited to agriculture alone. In truth, they touch nearly every aspect of life, including land use, climate resilience, nutrition, hunger reduction, and economic opportunity. At their core, food systems have the potential to end hunger not just in Ethiopia, but around the world. By strengthening how food is produced, processed, distributed, and consumed, global food systems can ensure that more people have consistent access to affordable, nutritious food.

Strong, inclusive systems can support smallholder farmers, improve distribution networks, and create safety nets that protect the most vulnerable from food insecurity.

At the same time, food systems are contributing to rising rates of chronic disease and environmental degradation. These patterns not only strain ecosystems but also increase the burden on public health systems. Meanwhile, today’s food systems are estimated to generate over $12 trillion in hidden costs according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Less than five percent of climate finance is directed toward fixing them.

Ethiopia: An Example of What’s Working So Far

Ethiopia presents encouraging examples of what’s possible. It has prioritized soil health through investments in soil mapping and regionally adapted fertilizer blending, as outlined in AGRA’s Ethiopia Strategic Plan (2023–2027), which supports national efforts to improve fertilizer quality and expand localized blending. Social safety nets, such as the Productive Safety Net Programme, also continue to play a critical role in protecting vulnerable households from food insecurity.

Progress in digital agriculture has also been notable. The country’s Digital Agriculture Roadmap outlines plans for interoperable systems linking farmer registries, market data, and advisory services. These goals align with regional aspirations for modern and inclusive agriculture. Youth engagement has also been meaningful. For instance, Ethiopia’s Green Legacy Initiative has mobilized millions of young people to plant trees and promote environmental stewardship nationwide. In schools, projects such as the Youth in Horticulture, an initiative by the Farm Secure Schools Africa, have combined hands-on gardening with nutrition education, encouraging students to participate directly in sustainable food systems.

The Gaps We Can’t Ignore

Still, significant challenges remain. One is the disconnect between livestock farming and soil management. Ethiopia’s Livestock Information System Roadmap focuses on veterinary services and disease tracking but does not connect livestock practices, such as manure recycling, to soil health strategies. This siloed approach misses a key opportunity for integrated land management. Countries such as Senegal face similar challenges, where livestock and soil health are addressed in parallel rather than in a coordinated way.

​​Another concern is the lack of quality control for fertilizers. While local blending has expanded, there is no dedicated public budget for laboratory testing. As a result, quality oversight is left to market forces. Kenya also implements a fertilizer subsidy scheme, but its quality assurance system is undermined by limited laboratory capacity and insufficient regulatory enforcement.

Water insecurity also remains unaccounted for in Ethiopia’s food policy framework. Although crop yield data is available, there is limited information on post-harvest losses or household-level food stress. Tools such as the Household Water Insecurity Experiences (HWISE) scale, which measures personal experiences of water-related hardship, could be adapted for this purpose.

Ethiopia’s digital agriculture framework remains focused on national implementation and rollout. While it demonstrates strong internal coordination, it does not yet incorporate the African Union (AU)’s standards for data governance or commit to the continent-wide digital infrastructure promoted by the AU Digital Agriculture Strategy. This limits opportunities for collaboration across national borders. A similar pattern is observed in Vietnam, where promising digital tools have emerged but remain disconnected from regional strategies. These examples show that many of Ethiopia’s food system challenges mirror wider global patterns.

What Ethiopia’s Case Tells Us About What Needs to Happen Next

To move from commitments to fundamental transformation, clear and actionable steps are needed. One critical issue raised in Ethiopia’s food systems strategy is that key sectors such as soil health, livestock, and digital agriculture are advancing in parallel but not in coordination. For example, the Livestock Information System Roadmap and Integrated Soil Fertility Management Manual are each robust in their own right. However, they fail to link grazing practices and manure reuse to soil restoration goals. Bridging these silos is essential for building a truly integrated and sustainable food system.

The Moment is Now

As one of many countries navigating food system transitions, Ethiopia’s progress, while uneven, offers valuable insights for peers around the world. The challenges it faces are not unique. Countries from West Africa to Southeast Asia are grappling with how to turn national food systems commitments into integrated, accountable action. These shared struggles highlight the need for stronger coordination, more transparent monitoring, and greater alignment with regional frameworks. The UNFSS Stocktake moment is the perfect opportunity to double down on technical support and promotion of the integration of food systems that support everyone.

In April 2025, over 2000 people gathered in Kigali for the first Global AI summit in Africa to discuss AI’s potential to increase economic opportunities for African citizens. Across various discussions, one thing was clear – Africa’s AI potential is real. The summit promised to move from discussions into actions, concluding with a clear outcome document: the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence. The declaration highlights the potential of AI and its dependence on the strength of data, infrastructure, governance, investments, human capacity, market, and international cooperation.

As governments, funders, entrepreneurs, and technology leaders rally around the AI moment and move towards actions, at Development Gateway, we are asking a different set of questions:

• Where is the data, and what is the quality of the data behind the algorithms?
• How will legacy government systems feed AI tools with fresh and usable data? 
• Are Government ministries resourced to govern and trust the AI tools that they are being encouraged to adopt?

Our answer is grounded in our experience over two decades: AI will not be able to scale without foundational data and infrastructure. Our focus has been on the less glamorous and often overlooked layers that are needed for every AI breakthrough – data, infrastructure, governance, and capacity.

What is missing from AI?

Conversations following the summit seem to focus on research and innovations as reflected in upcoming discussions such as the World Summit AI in October 2025 and the Southern African Conference for Artificial Intelligence happening in December 2025 (to name a few of many upcoming AI gatherings). Underpinning these innovations, there is a need for data systems, well-structured quality data, trust and transparency within institutions, and local ownership and capacity to govern these features. 

As highlighted in this blog on Artificial Intelligence for Public Good, when considering data for development, information about people is vital, particularly in the public sector. This includes the need for strong administrative systems that support service delivery and regular, representative national surveys & census efforts that ensure no one is left behind.  Despite this, across many African countries, data ecosystems remain reliant on paper-based systems and face major structural challenges. These include limited capacity to use data in decision-making, underdeveloped administrative data systems, insufficient investment in statistical capacity, costly and complex ICT infrastructure, and donor dependence for data initiatives.

The Invisible Layer: Infrastructure and People

In our work, we have observed that across sectors, governments rely on donor-funded servers, outdated systems, and overstretched ICT teams, as highlighted in this recent blog by Development Gateway and partners. One example: in Ethiopia, we found that the Ministry of Agriculture had fewer than 10 full-time staff managing 33 digital systems. The Ministry acknowledged that this is not sustainable.

At DG, we’re working with governments to:

• Analyze cloud vs. on-premise hosting options when looking at infrastructure. As outlined in Chapter 4 of our report on Demystifying interoperability, cloud can offer you flexibility, but on-site servers can align better with local resourcing and available skills. We work closely with partners to weigh the trade-offs, and it’s not always a one-size-fits-all solution, as it depends on context. Good infrastructure isn’t just about the technology; it’s about trust, sustainability, and what works best for the people it is meant to serve.
• Create internal AI Code assist tools that help overburdened technical teams manage dozens of integrated systems more effectively. We use Code Assist internally at DG, and by developing a custom one that helps with key maintenance tasks, it could speed up the onboarding of new staff (permanent and embedded). We are currently collaborating with the Ministry of Agriculture in Ethiopia on this initiative.
• Strengthen data quality. This requires striking a fine balance between not standing in the way of AI development and reinforcing that data quality is not just needed but a necessity. For example, in our work with the Ministry of Health in Kenya, Ethiopia, South Africa, DRC, Zambia, and Nigeria on tobacco control data, we work with the governments to embed a rigorous validation and review process that involves thematic experts on specific topics and research advisory groups that include the National Bureau of Statistics.
• Understand how investments in interoperability can optimize the value of existing, siloed data, but can also leave difficult-to-fill gaps when data connected via API is taken offline. For instance, in the wake of lost USAID funding, data sources via API may not have backups. 

While Governments are central stakeholders in AI governance, infrastructure must serve a broader ecosystem that includes academia, entrepreneurs/innovators, investors, the private sector, civil society organizations, and the communities they serve. All stakeholders need access to open, reliable, and affordable infrastructure that is also sustainable. Local stakeholders on the continent face significant challenges due to fragmented or donor-dependent systems.

 The African Union AI strategy outlines principles to be adopted, such as diversity, inclusivity, and African culture and values. The Data Values Project by GPSDD echoes this need by emphasising that data, and by extension AI, must be anchored in equity, trust, and community voices. By prioritizing values and principles described in the strategy, such as Ubuntu (respecting collective community over individuality), countries can build AI infrastructure that supports innovation not only across sectors but that can also serve communities in an equitable manner. 

The Road Ahead

The Kigali Summit confirmed that Africa’s AI trajectory is in motion. But critical questions remain:

• Which countries are investing in AI governance that reflects African values, equity, and local priorities? In particular, African countries must adopt a more nuanced and intentional approach to cultural preservation because the continent has a higher number of languages that aren’t already documented and used for existing algorithms. 
• Who will fund the data infrastructure and capacity work that makes AI safe, scalable, and inclusive?
• How can practitioners plug into global and regional initiatives to bring a practitioner’s lens to AI’s foundational layer?

The AI summit raised important reflections, but now we need solutions and tangible actions. In June 2025, Development Gateway co-developed a session with partners on what it takes for philanthropy to build technology that is equitable at the 9th East Africa Philanthropy Conference. We hope to see philanthropy and other funders move beyond pilots and quick innovation wins to investing in systems that can make AI sustainable, not only in the region, but also, we hope to see a similar trend emerge out of global fora such as the World Summit on the Information Society +20.

Ultimately, while these questions we’re asking are oriented towards Africa and the continent’s development, they are global in nature. People-driven AI will need to reflect localized norms with sustainable funding and pathways for the practitioner’s lens, as part of regional initiatives in Asia, South America, and elsewhere. 

“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” ~ Nelson Mandela

Education has long been recognized as a crucial driver in creating a more sustainable and equitable world. However, to understand how education is being delivered, who it reaches, where, and how effectively, we must first have access to quality, reliable educational data.

Across many sectors, countries, and contexts, Development Gateway: An IREX Venture (DG) has seen first-hand what makes data, technology, and evidence effective. Through this process, we have learned best practices for advising governments, agencies, and organizations on how to take practical, action-oriented steps to collect, monitor, evaluate, and use data to achieve impact.

This blog draws on DG’s experience in climate, health, aid management, and agriculture to explore connections between the challenges of data collection, data hosting, and data governance across different sectors and what the solutions to overcoming them can teach us about strengthening education data systems.

Overview of the EDI Project

In our latest education project, the Elimu Data Initiative (EDI), we aim to understand the existing open- and closed-source educational information management systems that track education data.

In the first iteration of this project, Hewlett 1.0 (2022 – 2024), DG conducted desk reviews and a series of stakeholder assessments to understand the education data ecosystems in Kenya and Senegal, culminating in a comparative white paper. As we enter into the project’s second phase with EDI, our aim is to grow on the successes of Hewlett 1.0. The project also aims to:

1. Assess and understand the existing landscape of digital systems being used for education data management through a paper comparing education management information systems;
2. Contribute to thought leadership on digital tools for education through discussion of and engagement with our learnings from the paper; and
3. Conduct stakeholder interviews with Nairobi County officials, who indicated a strong need for digital approaches in education. 

As we’ve begun these project activities, we’ve encountered recurring challenges in data collection, data hosting, and data governance. Reflecting on these challenges across multiple sectors, ranging from health to agriculture, can lead to innovative solutions that improve outcomes for the education sector.

Data Challenges: Perspectives from Multiple Sectors

Challenge #1: Data Collection

A challenge we have repeatedly encountered in various sectors is the collection and collation of data. In our white paper on Education Data-Driven Decision Mapping, for instance, stakeholders cited challenges with collecting data on student performance and other data entries. Teachers are often asked to spend a significant amount of time entering data into multiple online systems. Due to the lack of data sharing between these systems, teachers often struggle to balance other teaching priorities while simultaneously completing numerous lengthy forms. This pattern is a recurring trend in the education sector we have witnessed in a number of countries, from Jordan to Kenya.

However, data collection challenges aren’t unique to the education sector and have been an issue in DG’s creation of digital solutions in other sectors, too. In our climate program, the Great Green Wall, for example, it was difficult to secure financial commitment data from countries. We addressed this challenge by manually aggregating individual survey responses in order to provide a first-level baseline. We also ensured that this data was shared publicly through the Great Green Wall Accelerator, preventing the challenge of multiple concurrent closed datasets.

In the health sector and our Tobacco Control Data Initiative (TCDI), the demand for up-to-date tobacco control research required us to implement new national-level data collection efforts, collecting and collating data ranging from vaping in South Africa to the behavioral reasons why Nigerians choose to start smoking shisha (also known as “hookah”).

Lessons Learned: Having a clear understanding of what data already exists, how readily available it is, where gaps remain, and the supply of and demand for new data enables us to design systems that are usable within present data constraints and scalable as additional data is collected.

Challenge #2: Data Hosting

Another common challenge relates to how and where the data collected are housed. In any program, a key decision must be made as to whether data solutions will be housed locally on servers within national borders or hosted on the cloud. There is no one-size-fits-all solution to this challenge, and what works for one context may not work for another.

In the EDI education project, we began understanding this nuance while seeking to understand education data flows in different country contexts. In Togo, data sovereignty – i.e., hosting the data locally – is considered a priority when it comes to their national data, including education statistics such as the number of students enrolled, the number of teachers per school, and so on. However, they were not able to host this education data locally within their existing infrastructure. As such, they decided to pursue a compromise.

Currently, Togo uses their own data collection tool, StatEduc, to collect school data at the national level. In order to use the analytics and reporting capabilities of the University of Oslo’s platform DHIS2 for Education, they then manually export the data outside of Togo to the DHIS2 team. The DHIS2 and Togolese officials then work together to review and validate the data before inputting the validated education data into the DHIS2 platform. Although this process is cumbersome, it has been functioning reasonably well. However, now that Togo has built a new data center, they are pursuing migrating the data to be hosted either physically or virtually through Togolese servers. Doing so will streamline the integration process of education data and ensure that education data remains compliant with Togo’s national data regulations, while also cutting down on current manual data validation procedures.

In another example from our work in the agriculture sector, DG’s ‘A Livestock Information Vision for Ethiopia’ (aLIVE) team worked closely with ministry officials in Ethiopia to determine whether hosting nationally or in the cloud would be a better fit for their needs. As noted in chapter 4 of our white paper ‘Demystifying Interoperability: Insights from our work in Ethiopia’s agriculture sector,’ the advantages of cloud computing, such as improved scalability, can be outweighed by the cons, such as increased cost over time. Similarly, national hosting solutions also raise certain challenges. Although the advantages include improved bandwidth and higher degrees of control and access to the data, these may be outweighed by the challenges of maintaining a local team to manage hardware and software infrastructure. In the end, after considering a wide range of factors, it was decided to host the livestock platform on local servers.

Lessons Learned: Recognizing that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to data hosting means each solution must be carefully considered and evaluated in accordance with existing data protection laws, technical staff availability, and budget constraints.

Challenge #3: Data Governance

Besides data collection and data hosting, a third major challenge we’ve seen during our work in the education sector is related to data governance. When talking with education experts from Kenya, Senegal, and Europe, we find that a common trend in the conversation is the underutilization of human resources dedicated to data processing and analysis, which inhibits data quality assurance and the effective use of data for decision-making.

Through our work in Hewlett 1.0, for example, we discovered that in one Kenyan county, there was only one data official working on data analysis for the entire county. These limitations in human resources exacerbate existing data quality and access challenges and can result in these challenges not being prioritized at a management level. 

The lack of resources and the scarcity of officials dedicated to data governance is a challenge we have encountered in a wide variety of sectors, particularly those that deal directly with governance or public infrastructure. In the agricultural sector, for example, the aLIVE team faced data governance challenges related to understanding the existing data management practices prior to the program’s initiation. The team found that these data practices were often not documented and rather relied on the memory of staff members to inform others about them. Due to staff turnover and the volume of systems, each with its own governance standards, much of this information was either lost or convoluted in such a way that understanding the overarching data governance landscape was a significant challenge.

While it may be challenging to gain a full image of the data governance structures in place, it is still vital to understand as much as possible what already exists in terms of data management, practices, and processes. It’s extremely rare for there to be “zero” data governance and, as such, the best practice is to document all you can of this foundational knowledge and build from there. This documentation not only helps to alleviate duplication but also builds buy-in for new practices among local system owners.

Moreover, we have encountered this challenge in our work over the years, providing the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) with data strategy services, supporting the development of their global data governance strategy. As part of this long-term agreement, we have focused on what responsibilities data stewards should have and the functions they need to fill across UNICEF and the overall UN system. This process has highlighted the challenge of data governance in education and how building up the “data savvy” capacity in staffing functions across all levels of an organization can help to solve it.

Lessons Learned: The people, rules, and procedures that govern the use of data across systems must be reviewed as thoroughly as the technical requirements. By clearly documenting the current state of affairs, we can define the “unwritten” rules of data governance and streamline the integration of data into everyday decisions.

Charting a Path Forward in Digital Solutions

As we continue our work in health, agriculture, and education, we’ll continue to aggregate our lessons learned on data collection, data hosting, and data governance. Although there are common challenges across sectors, we see how a clear understanding of the data landscape, including what data governance practices and processes are in place, can inform the successful integration of new systems for many years to come.  

Development Gateway: An IREX Venture (DG) is pleased to announce the publication of a research manuscript on the Economic Costs of Tobacco-Related Illnesses in Kenya. This research was carried out as part of the Tobacco Control Data Initiative (TCDI) activities in Kenya and is part of a broader report on Morbidity and Mortality from Tobacco Use in Kenya. Data from this research is available on the TCDI Kenya dashboard, which aims to supply decision-makers in government, members of civil society, and academia with improved access to country-specific data to better inform tobacco control policy. 

Published in August 2024 in the Tobacco Use Insights journal, this is the third of three manuscripts that seek to break down the research report’s findings. The first, published in November 2023, explored the prevalence, patterns, and factors associated with tobacco use among patients with tobacco-related illnesses (TRIs), such as cancers, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes. The second, published in July 2024, focused on Mortality from Tobacco Use in Kenya. You can access its accompanying blog post here.

This blog highlights some key findings in the manuscript, based on the research carried out in Kenya from 2021-2022, estimating the direct, indirect, and ultimately economic costs of tobacco use for the period studied.

Why research on the economic burden of tobacco use in Kenya?

Indirect and direct medical costs of treating TRIs can place a significant economic burden on societies through healthcare and productivity losses. This is especially true for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which bear the brunt of the global tobacco crisis, accounting for a staggering 80% of tobacco-related deaths worldwide. As a result, assessing the economic impact of tobacco consumption in LMICs is crucial for shaping effective tobacco regulation and policy. However, this has been understudied in Africa, and the data that is available remains scant. In Kenya, estimating the economic costs of tobacco use is imperative to making informed, evidence-based policy decisions. 

This manuscript not only reveals the direct financial burden of tobacco use but also offers a solid foundation for defining the necessary policy actions to address its harmful health and economic consequences. Additionally, it highlights the far-reaching effects of exposure to secondhand smoke for non-smokers, responsible for an estimated 1.3 million deaths annually worldwide. Barring effective tobacco control interventions, LMICs will be up against higher tobacco-related healthcare costs, placing even more strain on already overwhelmed healthcare systems.

Key Findings from the Research

The estimated healthcare costs linked to tobacco use in Kenya are an alarming US$396.1 million  (approximately 53.4 billion KES).  Among the tobacco-related illnesses (TRIs) studied, myocardial infarction (heart attack) was the leading cost driver, accounting for US$158.7 million (approximately 21.42 billion KES). Following that, peripheral arterial disease and stroke each contributed US$63.7 million (approximately 8.74 billion KES) and US$44.7 million (approximately 6.02 billion KES) in healthcare expenses, respectively. A significant portion of these costs -over 90% – is driven by the expense of medications required to manage these conditions.

Regarding productivity losses due to tobacco-related illnesses, the costs range from US$148 (approximately 19,980 KES) per person to US$360 per person (approximately 48,600 KES), making up between 27% and 48% of the total economic burden. Productivity losses from the diseases ranged between US$148 (approximately KES 19,980) and US$360 (approximately KES 48,600), accounting for 27% to 48% of the economic costs.

In terms of healthcare costs per case, lung cancer was the most expensive, costing US$23,365 (approximately KES 3,150,275) per case, followed by oral-pharyngeal cancer at US$7,637 (approximately KES 1,031,995), and laryngeal cancer at US$6,922 (approximately KES 933,470).

In 2022, the tobacco industry in Kenya generated $7.35 million in revenue, representing 7% of the country’s GDP of US$105 billion. However, the economic cost of tobacco use – just for the illnesses included in the study – accounts for more than 34% of this revenue. In other words, the financial toll of tobacco use in Kenya ranges from US$544.74 million (approximately KES 73.5 billion) to US$756.22 million (approximately KES 102.1 billion), while the tobacco industry’s contribution to the country’s GDP is much smaller at US$252.93 million (approximately KES 34.1 billion).

When comparing these figures, tobacco use results in a net loss to the economy of between US$291.8 million (approximately KES 39.4 billion) and US$503.3 million (approximately KES 67.9 billion) each year. This means that for every dollar the tobacco industry earns, the economy loses between KES 297 and KES 405 in healthcare costs and lost productivity, illustrating a poor return on investment.

The analysis further shows that treating tobacco-related illnesses (TRIs) in Kenya is an enormous financial burden on the healthcare system, with total treatment costs estimated at US$2.8 billion (approximately KES 378 billion). Of this, US$396.1 million (approximately KES 53.4 billion) is attributed explicitly to tobacco use, accounting for 14% of the overall costs of managing these diseases. In terms of comparison, the economic burden of tobacco use in Kenya is somewhat less than in South Africa, where the cost is US$2.88 billion (approximately KES 388.8 billion), but more than in Uganda, where the cost is US$126.5 million (approximately KES 17.1 billion).

These differences can be attributed to varying smoking rates and the prevalence of tobacco-related illnesses in each country.

Implications for Policy

To address the economic and health impacts of tobacco use in Kenya, several key policy recommendations can be made:

• Strengthen Tobacco Control Laws: Implement comprehensive tobacco control legislation, enforce existing laws rigorously, and increase taxes on tobacco products to make them less affordable and accessible.
• Promote Cessation Programs: Advocate for the introduction of more support services for people trying to quit smoking, as well as monitor the tobacco industry’s activities to ensure they comply with existing regulations.
• Engage Stakeholders and Raise Awareness: Build stronger collaborations with relevant stakeholders, run public awareness campaigns to educate people about the dangers of tobacco use, and encourage policymakers to prioritize tobacco control on the national agenda.
• Capacity Building for Enforcement: Invest in strengthening enforcement mechanisms and provide training for healthcare professionals on effective tobacco cessation strategies.
• Leverage International Partnerships: Work with international organizations to tap into their expertise and resources, ensuring the successful implementation of tobacco control measures.
• Adopt Global Best Practices: Align local policies with global best practices and evidence-based strategies to enhance tobacco control efforts in Kenya.
• Use Research to Inform Policy: Use ongoing research and data to develop evidence-based policies supporting tobacco cessation and reducing tobacco-related harm.

By adopting these policy measures, Kenya can mitigate the significant economic burden of tobacco use and work towards better health outcomes for its population.

If you would like to learn more about TCDI and explore country-specific data, kindly visit www.tobaccocontroldata.org.

The immediate effects of cuts to USAID are becoming clearer, with the US largely absent from the international response to the Ebola outbreak in Uganda, the devastating earthquake in Myanmar, and the humanitarian crisis in Sudan. While the direct impacts of these cuts are making headlines, there is also a less visible, systemic consequence that could undermine development and humanitarian efforts long into the future: the destabilization of the data ecosystems that underpin global health, education, nutrition, agriculture, water, and sanitation services.

For decades, USAID and other US government funding have supported data used around the world. This includes routine survey data collection through programs like the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), which operated in more than 90 countries to understand local and global trends, sophisticated satellite-based early warning systems for famine and disease outbreaks, and perhaps most critically, support to core administrative data systems used by government ministries to plan, budget, and target services. As country governments and their international development and philanthropic partners plan for a new development landscape, they will need to quickly identify and effectively fill these alarming gaps.

Beyond the immediate impacts of cuts on data for service delivery, budget planning, policymaking, and emergency surveillance, the abrupt termination of USAID funding is also putting at risk a promising trend toward the modernization of data systems as countries look ahead to digital transformation, digital public infrastructure, and AI readiness.

The twin crises of data and digital systems 

Digital and AI technologies offer huge potential for increasing efficiency at a moment when country leaders must achieve more with fewer resources. The ability to better deliver public services through digital and AI technology depends on the successful collection, sharing, and management of data across and beyond government. Without investment in country data systems, there will be limited data to power AI solutions and drive the longer-term digital transformation of public services. 

The immediate effects of the funding freeze (and subsequent terminations of programs) on the digital systems underpinning key service delivery are starkly demonstrated in Kenya. A March 28th, 2025 letter from civil society and community representatives to the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC) states:

Kenya’s EMR system went dark following the Stop Work Orders because, although the system is managed by the Kenyan government, it was physically hosted by a server operated by a USAID-funded implementing partner. 

This presents a real risk to the progress made in the digital transformation of Kenya’s health care system, threatening the ability of healthcare workers to deliver life-saving care. Our partners have informally highlighted similar risks playing out in countries across the region, including agricultural data systems in Ethiopia, health systems in Ghana, and critical health commodity supply chain systems in Tanzania. 

These twin crises – a halt to data collection and the undermining of digital systems – reveal existing inefficiencies and instabilities in how data is collected, managed, and shared both within and between countries. This moment also provides an opportunity to reimagine some long-standing problems in how governments and donors think about data and digital investments. There is a chance now to strengthen country ownership and investment in data systems, to reduce fragmentation, and to create more sustainable data systems. And as digital innovations like AI make data even more influential than before, it stands to transform public services and optimize – or even revolutionize – their delivery.

Reshaping digital and data policy for the long term

The seemingly quiet collapse of data systems is alarming and poses major short-term and longer-term challenges. It also reinforces the downsides to the previous donor-funded approach to data, which often led to fragmented sets of data systems, each for its own purpose. There has been insufficient attention to interoperability or an overall comprehensive and efficient architecture, and no clear sustainability model beyond additional donor-funded projects.  As countries respond to the new development funding reality, we anticipate governments will be forced to adapt in ways that reshape digital policy, financing, and implementation. This adaptation offers the opportunity to reimagine data ecosystems that are owned by local actors, sustainably financed, and poised to unlock new opportunities for transformation:

1. Now is the time to increase emphasis on data sovereignty, data localization, and data protection, including close attention to where systems are hosted and how their availability is funded and guaranteed. Decisions that lead to “good” digital public infrastructure that prioritizes “future-proofing” are notoriously difficult, as described in Chapter 4 of DG’s “Demystifying Interoperability” publication. However, these decisions, particularly in times of resource scarcity and crises, can be made by prioritizing political consensus around sustainable digital systems and “good” practices.
2. Sustainable data systems will require more domestic resources and investment in data. The abrupt halt of USAID funding for data systems underscores that aid-funded models are not fully sustainable. But scarce domestic funding and other priorities have blocked the pathway to full country ownership.  Initiatives like the UN/World Bank ‘Power of Data’ coalition are bringing together donors, multilaterals, and governments at the national level to strengthen political support, agree on priorities, and commit to funding data systems in line with national growth and development strategies.  
3. New investors and funders can maximize returns by funding systems and reducing fragmentation. The current crisis reveals how the fragmentation of data systems has weakened their resilience, as a lack of interoperability and failure to properly integrate digital and data systems have created missed chances to innovate and modernize. Funding that focuses on strengthening the whole system to support innovation can accelerate the adoption of new approaches and support private sector innovation.

The role of development partners

Beyond the immediate need for resources to support continuity of core systems like Kenya’s EMR, the fallout from the termination of USAID funding demonstrates the need for a new strategic approach to partnership. These partnerships need to be grounded in country ownership, in turn requiring governments to prioritize, resource, and maintain critical digital and data systems, and requiring development partners to ensure they align their contributions with these priorities.

Digital transformation frameworks and roadmaps used to guide donor investments must be pragmatic and focused on the implementation and integration of core digital and data systems, both new and legacy systems. 

Philanthropic and development partners need to make a concerted effort to support the rapid creation of country digital and data strategies for transition to true local ownership that emphasize: 

• Domestic resource mobilization

• Data governance and interoperability of core systems

• Technology strategies that streamline the plethora of existing digital and data systems to align with the national strategy

• System ownership, sustainability, and localization. 

How these elements are implemented also requires intentionality. Data systems can and should be financed through diversified models that blend public, private, and philanthropic investments. Diversified funding mechanisms are possible, but the philanthropic and development community beyond the US Government needs to be strategic in their actions and partnership structures in how they act as a partner to support countries in making these transitions. Aid and philanthropy play an important role in de-risking investments in data, allowing for multiple building blocks of funding to deliver an intentional ecosystem approach to funding data systems.

With a country-owned strategy in place that strictly prioritizes the function, data sharing, and use of core systems, governments can direct traffic and create new funding models for data, as new partners can pay for aspects of the system that match their needs. We saw this take shape in our VIFAA program, where private sector stakeholders in Nigeria co-invested $120k to ensure state-disaggregated data on fertilizer availability and use. The private sector should not be expected to fund everything (and often cannot, due to antitrust laws), but it is an under-utilized source of both funding and innovation in government digital transformations.

The way forward 

In the immediate term, supporting the critical services whose delivery was disrupted by the US withdrawal must be the development community’s priority. However, the medium- to long-term implications of data system failures extend beyond immediate disruptions; they threaten progress toward equitable, effective, data-driven delivery and readiness for future innovation.

As we assess what should be preserved in the wake of mass funding cuts, there is a clear role for pragmatic investments in digital public infrastructure built on core data systems, but this time with countries in the lead and stronger coordination and alignment among development partners.

Africa is a leading producer of raw cashew nuts (RCNs), accounting for a significant portion of global production. In 2023, West Africa’s cashew harvest reached a record-breaking 3 million tons, marking a 15% increase from the previous year.  Côte d’Ivoire stands out as the world’s top producer, with a crop of approximately 1.2 million metric tons. Other major producers in the region include Nigeria, Ghana, and Benin.

Cashew farming in West Africa is predominantly carried out by smallholder farmers, with over 2 million farmers contributing to more than 30% of the global supply. The profitability of cashew farming varies based on factors such as market information, yield, market access, and global prices. 

As part of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)’s Food for Progress PRO-Cashew project for West Africa, Development Gateway: An IREX Venture (DG) collaborated with Cultivating New Frontiers in Agriculture (CNFA) to develop a data collection and analysis platform. This platform aims to enhance cashew productivity and competitiveness by supporting informed decision-making across the value chain in Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Nigeria. Informed decision-making can help gain higher productivity through increased yields per hectare and reduced post-harvest losses, improve competitiveness through high-quality cashews meeting global standards, and help create more jobs.

The project came to an end in August 2024 after four years of working with government agencies, producers, traders, processors, and development partners in the five implementing countries to co-create an online tool aimed to inform, support, promote, and strengthen Africa’s cashew industry.

This blog outlines some of the key project highlights, including some of the challenges we faced, lessons learned, success stories, and identified opportunities for a more competitive cashew sector in West Africa.

Building the Cashew-IN Platform

PRO-Cashew aims to address the underlying issues of competitiveness in West Africa’s cashew sector, the inconsistent cooperation amongst regional policymakers, and the resulting trade impediments. The project identified, prioritized, and implemented strategic activities at different points of the cashew value chain to meet the unfulfilled needs of the target group beneficiaries more effectively. To incentivize, strengthen, and empower cashew value chain actors with actionable data, CNFA and DG designed a cashew data collection and analysis system (Cashew-IN) to expand and improve existing data-sharing systems focused on cashew production, trade, and processing levels.

Cashew-IN aims to make data easier to use for better decisions and improved outcomes in the cashew market. To support these objectives, DG used its Custom Assessment Landscape Methodology (CALM) to identify gaps in existing data collection, storage, and analytical tools in the cashew sector, as well as key decisions and target “use cases” for the future users of Cashew-IN. These learnings guided the design of Cashew-IN, a platform that addresses production, processing, and trade themes through a suite of visual tools configured to monitor and track associated indicators.

The Cashew-IN web application includes a user interface powered by WordPress, a user-friendly and intuitive software. It extracts its information from the embedded database configured to accommodate data starting from 2015 onwards. The data and information are entered by officially designated focal points by country. The Cashew-IN platform includes i) a regional dashboard managed by the International Cashew Council (CICC) and ii) country dashboards managed by an officially designated country administrator.

Sustainability Plan

As the Cashew-IN platform is regional in scope, DG has identified the International Cashew Advisory Council (CICC), an intergovernmental organization promoting cashew value chains, as a sustainability partner. The CICC comprises 11 countries, including the five Cashew-IN countries, and is decentralized at the level of each member country, with focal points per country from the cashew sector’s regulatory bodies or, failing that, the Ministry of Agriculture. CICC was selected to coordinate the operation of the Cashew-IN platform at regional and country levels through systematic and continuous data collection efforts leading to exhaustive and reliable data likely to inform decisions for a more competitive cashew sector. 

To support ownership and sustainability at the country level, DG worked with national stakeholders from government institutions, producer associations, and the private sector to set up national committees responsible for managing their own version of the Cashew-IN platform in compliance with their laws and regulations governing data collection, ownership, and publication. 

Lessons Learned & Stories of Change

First, the importance of data security and compliance with the countries’ data frameworks. One of the country’s Ministry of Agriculture was quite reluctant after the platform was first introduced, mainly because of data management and confidentiality concerns that emerged from a bad experience with a former partner. Understanding that Cashew-IN will be adapted to their national framework on data disclosure and that data will remain the property of the source helped alleviate their concerns and encouraged their involvement. The Ministry of Agriculture spontaneously joined the steering committee group. 

Secondly, engaging and empowering national partners from the project assessment phase onwards – in line with the DG’s collaborative approach – facilitated the platform’s technical development and their buy-in and commitment. During the project’s closing workshop, one country’s representatives announced, as part of their ownership and sustainability strategies, the upcoming recruitment of an IT specialist who will be specifically dedicated to managing the Cashew-IN platform.

During the project’s closing workshop, one country’s representatives announced, as part of their ownership and sustainability strategies, the upcoming recruitment of an IT specialist who will be specifically dedicated to managing the Cashew-IN platform.

Finally, at the regional level, the CICC has taken ownership of the platform by providing two IT staff who have been trained to manage, update, and use the platform as well as adding new features. The Executive Director of the CICC also announced a plan to include other CICC member countries that are not involved in the Pro-Cashew-In programme and create a consultative committee made up of the three CICC technical committees (Production, Research,  and Processing).

Appropriation and Capacity Building 

DG conducted several sessions on platform use and management, data upload and configuration as well as maintenance of the platform. 56 country administrators and focal points of data-holding organizations from Benin, Burkina Faso, Nigeria, and the CICC have been trained to manage and use the Cashew-IN platform. 12 IT specialists from the same countries have also been trained to get familiar with the technologies used in the Cashew-IN platform, enabling them to support its development at the end of the project implementation. Following the technical training, the source code was shared with the IT specialists for exploration and modification.

Recommendations

To ensure greater ownership and sustainability of the platform and a significant impact on stakeholders (decision makers, producers, traders, processors, and academics), we recommend the following actions : 

• Institutionalization of the platform with a view to systematizing data collection and updating the platform;
• Use of the platform as a reference for decisions taken in the cashew nut sector at both political and private sector levels;
• Involvement of trained stakeholders (IT specialists and focal points) in the maintenance and ongoing technical development of the platform;
• The gradual integration of other CICC member countries into the platform for better regional coverage.

What Comes Next

A few cashew-producing countries that were not included in the Pro-Cashew project expressed interest in joining the initiative (Mali, Senegal, Cameroon, Togo, etc.), an idea also supported by CICC, which expressed its interest in including other cashew-producing countries in the region. 

From the program, we confirmed the necessity for DG to work closely with its partners to deliver outcomes that are both useful and meaningful. This project also revealed the importance of local capacity-building to manage the tool even after the project came to an end in August 2024. 

Developing a digital solution can be a challenge, but including the beneficiaries from the onset and working closely with them throughout the project implementation has proven to be efficient as well as rewarding for the DG team.

This article was originally published here.

While a lot of us have talked about the potential, value, and – in some cases – need for more mergers and acquisitions in the non-profit space, recent events have made it clear: now is the time.

In the early days of these shifts, our team circulated a survey to civil society and international development organizations – and the resulting data, from more than 700 organizations, suggests that nearly 60% or organizations may close within the next 6 months. Given the recent stop work orders, contract and grant cancellations, and cascading effects of international civil society support shifts, a large number of non-profit, international development, and civil society organizations are confronting the need to re-organize. 

Reorganizing is easier to say than do, though, and mergers and acquisitions in the nonprofit world are not nearly as common as they should be – but they can amplify impact and efficiencies. Strategic partnerships and mergers typically take 1-2 years to implement, but the hundreds of organizations facing newly shortened runways will have  to act a lot faster if they are going to prevent the loss of significant amounts of knowledge, expertise and assets. 

That’s why the teams at Accountability Lab, Development Gateway: An IREX Venture and Digital Public, partnered up: develop both a new toolkit, a partnership matching service, and professional support infrastructure aimed at assisting the organizations facing this challenge. While there’s no “one” name or type of transition that captures the reorganizing work ahead – from partnerships to mergers to legacy planning, our toolkit aims to de-mystify the processes and work that organizations will need to do to prepare for next steps. We are especially, and specifically, focused on helping mission-driven organizations navigate transitions in ways that preserve valuable teams, projects, technology, and knowledge. 

While resources are important, we are dedicated to a more active approach – and so we’ve also launched a partner-matching service for groups hoping to bring on new initiatives and those who are hoping to help find their work find new homes. Already, we’ve had a number of promising discussions on how to get started, and heard the importance of centering trust, alignment, and proactive engagement. Designing a partnership or organizational transition is about identifying, articulating, and committing to practical, operational efforts to invest in a shared vision. The exercise has also shown how focusing on value proposition helps partners find alignments. Often, an inventory is a good starting point.

• Mapping what makes you unique

Consider the elements that differentiate your work or approaches. These may not be “things,” and instead be ways of doing things, captured in a toolset or service architecture, but they may be important to preserve and valuable to other organizations. Listing your team’s core skills and comparative advantages is also critical, along with ongoing lines of revenue. It’s helpful to think about the assumptions and dependencies required to keep the lines operating.

• Analyzing the landscape 

Many organizations may have a shared definition of problems they are trying to solve but differ considerably in terms of their context and approach. Think about who is prioritising the impact or vision you hope to have and who is solving similar structural challenges in your field. Also, who has infrastructure and investments in your sector? Contexts adjacent to your work are likely to be aligned with it. 

• Merger, partnership, or wind-down?

Consider several types of alignment based on mission, strategic approach, operations, technology, finances, culture, and politics. Each serves as a critical checkpoint to ensure that any merger or partnership enhances both organizations and sustains their shared goals. Thoroughly assessing alignment allows you to prioritize what’s important and avoid partnerships that might not align with your long-term vision. 

• Finalizing solid partnership agreements

Once you identify the right partner, negotiations need to be handled carefully—ensuring all parties understand their roles, set clear expectations, and use frameworks that keep the process on track. Manage the tension between “fast,” “sustainable,” and “perfect.” The effort that makes the difference is being willing to engage in the messiness, build feedback loops and external legitimacy with stakeholder groups, and focus on sustaining the things that you prioritized in the beginning. 

Overall, setting clear expectations and identifying deal-breakers early in the process will help safeguard each organization’s mission and values. Related considerations, such as digital development safety nets that consolidate and integrate infrastructures and preserve institutional knowledge and assets, must also be carefully outlined. This work ties into valuable, overarching objectives in terms of protecting and maintaining the global civil society ecosystem. Strategic partnerships and mergers of this kind offer a viable path for many organizations to sustain their impact amid unprecedented challenges.

Download our Strategic Partnership Toolkit below.

*Is your organization considering a strategic partnership or merger of some sort? Accountability Lab, Development Gateway: An IREX Venture, and Digital Public would like to offer support for confidential conversations, documentation of needs, and identification of potential matches between organizations to fast-track collaborations.

Please complete the survey here or reach out to: Khadijah Chang khadijahc@accountabilitylab.org to discuss next steps. 

Food and nutrition insecurity are among our time’s most remarkable development challenges. In 2023, an estimated 846.6 million people across Africa faced moderate-to-severe food insecurity. Considering that this accounts for 58% of the continent’s total population, it is evident that immediate and long-term solutions are needed to strengthen food systems and address Africa’s food insecurity crisis.

The World Soil Charter emphasizes that healthy soil is fundamental to food security. However, soil degradation poses a major threat, with approximately 33% of global soils classified as moderately to highly degraded, 40% located in Africa. If left unaddressed, projections indicate that over half of Africa’s current arable land could become unusable by 2050.

The Nairobi Declaration: A Continental Call to Action

Introducing the Soil Nutrient Roadmap (SNR)

For over a decade, Development Gateway: An IREX Venture (DG) has been at the forefront of digital agriculture, leveraging agricultural data to support input monitoring, value chain analysis, and farmer-centric governance models. With funding from the Gates Foundation, DG is launching the Soil Nutrient Roadmap (SNR), a cutting-edge initiative using geospatial data to estimate current and future soil and crop nutrient requirements.

Building on the momentum of the Africa Soil Health Summit and the Nairobi Declaration, SNR aims to support African countries in designing national soil health strategies and investment plans. This initiative seeks to provide timely, relevant, and context-specific data for governments, the private sector, and agricultural stakeholders, enabling them to make informed decisions on soil health interventions.

To achieve this, SNR’s primary objective is to:

• Estimate current and future soil and crop nutrient requirements at national and subnational levels.
• Develop a roadmap to coordinate stakeholders and support investment planning.
• Enable governments, private sector actors, and implementing partners to collaborate on soil nutrient solutions.
• Provide decision-support tools for policy formulation and agricultural strategy development.

Designing and Testing the SNR Concept

In 2023/2024, with support from the Gates Foundation and Boston Consulting Group (BCG), in partnership with the International Fertilizer Association (IFA), collaborated to design a framework for national-level soil nutrient roadmaps. Ministries of Agriculture in Ethiopia, Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Ghana strongly supported the initiative, emphasizing its potential to transform fertilizer sectors and investment priorities in soil health.

Encouraged by the interest from a wide range of national and subnational stakeholders, the proof-of-concept has progressed into a 24-month acceleration phase led by DG. This phase will focus on developing an interoperable, data-driven platform to facilitate coordinated action and inform policy, regulatory, and investment decisions.

The project will be implemented over 2025–2026 in up to four Sub-Saharan countries: Kenya, Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Ghana. It will produce:

1. The SNR framework: A suite of data, protocols, and models generating diagnostics to prioritize soil health interventions. 
2. A user dashboard: An interactive tool for country-level scenario visualization.
3. Performance Indicators: Country-specific metrics for measuring impact and progress.

SNR will also investigate partnership models and sustainability strategies to ensure long-term impact and viability in different regions and chart a path toward the project’s localization.

The Roadmap

1. Diagnostic Phase: Identifying Key Soil Health Challenges

This first phase of the roadmap aims to map out crop nutrient cycles, quantify indigenous nutrient supply, identify nutrient deficiencies, and determine key limiting factors such as soil acidity, erosion, and leaching. The insights will inform the setting of ambition levels and data-driven targets for national soil health strategies.

2. Solution Design Phase: Developing Targeted Interventions

Using diagnostic insights, SNR will design context-specific solutions, prioritizing key intervention areas, such as:

• Soil health & fertility practices such as intercropping and liming;
• Nutrient supply optimization;
• Water management;
• Seed improvement and
• Agricultural mechanization.

Each solution will undergo a simulation to determine its technical and financial requirements, the return on investment (ROI) assessment, and the development of regulatory, economic, training, and infrastructure support mechanisms.

3. Implementation Planning: Delivering Scalable Solutions

This final phase integrates prioritized solutions into an actionable national roadmap, detailing funding needs, governance structures, and implementation plans. This phase will also establish a Project Management Office to oversee execution and ensure measurable impact.

By addressing Africa’s interconnected agricultural challenges, SNR will empower governments and stakeholders with data-driven solutions to enhance soil health restoration efforts, increase domestic fertilizer production and distribution, improve smallholder farmers’ access to advisory services, and strengthen agricultural resilience against climate change.

SNR represents a critical opportunity to reshape Africa’s agricultural future, ensuring food security, economic growth, and environmental sustainability. As national soil health strategies take shape, the collaborative efforts of governments, private sector actors, and development organizations will be essential in realizing a resilient and productive agricultural landscape for future generations.

In today’s fast-evolving world, governments and public organizations are under more pressure than ever before to deliver efficient, transparent services that align with public expectations. While this increased pressure is largely due to the rapid digitization of public life, it is also the case that digital transformation is perfectly placed to be the ideal enabler of public value. When implemented correctly, that is.

In this blog, we delve into the key concepts behind digital transformation and how it can enhance public value by promoting transparency, informing policy, and supporting evidence-based decision-making.

The Path to Enabling Public Value

Digital Transformation: Building a Strong Foundation for Value Creation

Digital transformation, the use of information and communication technologies to develop new capabilities in business, government, and society, goes well beyond mere automation. It involves adopting technologies to boost productivity, create value, and improve social welfare. Digital transformation offers significant opportunities to enhance public value, yet it also presents certain challenges that require strategic solutions to ensure it is implemented equitably and sustainably.

Data and digital technologies provide a pathway for governments to create public value through increased transparency and informed decision-making. By collating data, enhancing data systems and safeguards, and promoting cross-functional operations through interoperable data systems, we can establish a strong foundation for value creation in the public sector.

At Development Gateway, we focus on making data more usable and interoperable to drive better decision-making and transparency. Below are two of our programs where we helped achieve this, building a pragmatic foundation for value creation in the public sector.

Towards Interoperability and Transparency: The ‘a Livestock Information Vision for Ethiopia’ (aLIVE) Program

There has been increasing focus in the development space for the need to create seamless, integrated data ecosystems. Such ecosystems allow for the free flow of data between systems and across ministries and departments in the public sector while ensuring that said data remains secure. While system interoperability may be a key focus for governments aiming to improve efficiency and service delivery, this is often technically challenging for them to achieve.

In the aLIVE program, we are working with Ethiopia’s Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) and other stakeholders to digitize livestock traceability in the country, ensuring increased accessibility to and quality of livestock data. The initiative addresses challenges faced by farmers, policymakers, and stakeholders resulting from fragmented and inconsistent livestock information. By establishing a unified, accessible data platform, aLIVE supports better decision-making, enhances market access, and boosts the productivity and resilience of Ethiopia’s livestock sector.

aLIVE enables public value through digital transformation of the livestock sector in the following ways:

Improved decision-making: By providing reliable, timely livestock data, the program enables government agencies, NGOs, and farmers to make more informed, data-driven decisions. This facilitates better resource allocation and more effective, evidence-based policies.

Enhanced livelihoods: The program helps farmers improve their productivity and increase their income-generating potential by offering data-driven insights on market conditions, livestock management, and disease control.

Sectoral coordination: By integrating five legacy systems for livestock into a common data standard – the Livestock Information System (LIS) – aLIVE facilitates coordination among stakeholders in the livestock sector, fostering collaboration and reducing duplication of efforts.

Resilience and adaptation: Access to timely, readily available data is essential for livestock management, as it allows farmers to better adapt to challenges such as climate change and disease outbreaks, thereby enhancing the resilience of the livestock sector.

Improving Public Procurement Processes: DG’s Open Contracting (OC) Portal

Through our Open Contracting initiatives, we leverage data and technology to improve how governments manage public contracts. This, in turn, benefits citizens and promotes social and economic development, enhancing public value by increasing the transparency, accountability, and efficiency of public procurement processes.

An example of this is the county-level Open Contracting Portal we developed with the government of Makueni County in Kenya. This has since been designated as a digital public good (DPG) and added to the Digital Public Goods Alliance’s (DPGA’s) Registry, which ensures the OC Portal aligns with ethical, inclusive, and sustainable digital development principles.

The OC Portal is an interactive site providing detailed information about each step of the tender, award, and implementation process. It includes a series of charts that offer helpful data insights that can be utilized by civil society, the government, and the public. In addition to the public data available on the platform, government users can also access the Corruption Risk Dashboard – a tool that identifies tenders and awards based on specific metrics that indicate possible corrupt activities. The Portal also includes various ways in which to incorporate feedback from the public, including an SMS feature allowing for great accessibility.

The OC Portal exemplifies how digital public goods can enable public value by enhancing transparency and accountability while also reducing corruption, improving service delivery, and fostering economic growth. 

…

While the concept of adding public value may seem abstract or theoretical, its true significance is to be found in its practical applications. Real-world efforts, such as promoting transparency, enhancing decision-making, and supporting sustainable development, demonstrate how public value can be effectively operationalized and turned into tangible outcomes that have a positive impact on society.