Visualizing the Interdependencies between Conflict, Climate Change, and Natural Disasters
How do conflict, climate change, and natural disasters overlap — and how can policymakers mitigate these challenges? The Complex Emergencies and Political Stability in Asia (CEPSA) program is a 3 year project funded by the US Department of Defense that explores the interdependencies of these issues and their impact on Asia. Most importantly, CEPSA also seeks to provide potential strategies to mitigate these challenges. CEPSA is a collaborative research program led by the Robert Strauss Center at the University of Texas-Austin; the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data project; Development Gateway; and the University of California-Berkeley.
One of CEPSA’s core outputs is the Complex Emergencies Dashboard, a public, online geospatial mapping tool designed to visualize trends in disaster vulnerability, climate security, conflict, governance and disaster aid in Asia. The dashboard displays CEPSA-produced datasets for 11 countries in South and Southeast Asia — allowing policymakers, researchers, and NGOs to visualize areas of insecurity overlap. In doing so, these audiences can both prepare for and effectively design responses to complex emergencies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f449/4f449648c825ea3ea1678985c7b6d0926499e31a" alt="CEPSA.png"
For example, users can examine the current distribution of climate and disaster aid in Bangladesh against areas most vulnerable to disaster. The dashboard also allows users to overlay externally-created geospatial data on terrorism, piracy, etc.
A key goal of the Complex Emergencies Dashboard is to help local and national governments identify communities in need of resilience-related investments. By overlaying information — such as the number of disaster response trainings taking place across India against areas of climate change vulnerability — decision makers better understand whether resource gaps exist, and which interventions would best support resilience building.
Conflict, disasters, and climate change are interdependent challenges across both Asia and the world. We believe that being able to more easily visualize and understand this interplay is an important step for policymakers towards developing holistic action plans and sustainable solutions. The Complex Emergencies Dashboard will be publicly available online in Fall 2017. Until then, be sure to check back for more updates.
Share This Post
Related from our library
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2868/a2868547c2dde5cf4aed931d2c7615b0369d97e4" alt=""
The Cancer-Tobacco Link: Using Data to Drive Stronger Tobacco Control Policies
As we observe World Cancer Day today, it is crucial to recognize the significant role smoking plays in the global cancer epidemic. Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of cancer and cancer-related deaths worldwide, necessitating a dynamic, multidisciplinary approach to tobacco control interventions. DG’s Tobacco Control Data Initiative (TCDI) contains country-specific websites designed to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a15a7/a15a7eb961eb13582d320c0c2ff154dd36613a16" alt=""
The Future of Technology Governance and Global Development: Why DG Brought DataReady In-house
DG is excited to announce we now have more robust data governance advisory services with the recent integration of DataReady.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c787b/c787b713d8c0295c46dd55139ee99fb48693a4a1" alt=""
Stakeholder, Where Art Thou?: Three Insights on Using Governance Structures to Foster Stakeholder Engagement
Through our Tobacco Control Data Initiative (TCDI) program and its sister program Data on Youth and Tobacco in Africa (DaYTA), we have learned that creating governance structures, such as advisory boards or steering committees, is one approach to ensuring that digital solutions appropriately meet stakeholders’ needs and foster future stakeholder engagement. In this blog, we explore three insights on how governance structures can advance buy-in with individual stakeholders while connecting them to one another.