In addition to supporting timely data collection about water access in Tanzania, the Sensors, Empowerment, and Accountability (SEMA) network provides a public-facing District Water Engineer Dashboard.
Figure 1: Screenshot of DWE Dashboard Map
This dashboard allows key audiences – citizens, District Water Engineers (DWEs), other Ministry of Water and Irrigation officials – to easily view the statuses of individual water points. Community reporters can also verify whether government receives their reports. Users further have the ability to filter by water point by type, quality, quantity, and source, either on the map or in bar chart format.
Figure 2: Screenshot of Dashboard Charts
Importantly, the mobile application is accessible also on mobile – not just to create water points (which can also occur without internet connectivity with data synchronization taking place when a connection is next detected) but also view them. This is important for users when they cannot access the desk version.
Figure 3: Screenshot of Mobile App
Importantly, the DWE Dashboard moves beyond reported data, and incorporates complex visualizations related to water coverage and scarcity calculations – key for effective government planning.
Traditionally, the Ministry computes the percentage of coverage met my functional water points using the following formula, where one functional water point is assumed to have the capacity to serve 250 people:
This visualization is included in the dashboard, but has limitations. Namely, it does not take into account distance from a village to the water point, and only considers water point functionality.
Figure 4: Screenshot of Simple Coverage
Through SEMA, we proposed an innovation on the water coverage methodology, by incorporating an external population dataset from WorldPop. This dataset provided estimates on how many people live in each square 100 meters around the world, stored in raster format.
Our team imported the WordPop data into the dashboard’s PostGIS database. We then were able to set up calculations to determine how many people each water point serves, based on distance from each point. Dashboard users can toggle the distance, from 400 to 5,000 square meters.
Figure 5: Population served by water point: Higher risk area since there is more population (distance is not the only factor)
Figure 6: Population served by water point: Lower risk area (since there’s less population)
Enabling these distance-based calculations also allowed us to include visualizations of the distance between health facilities and water points – an important planning consideration for the Ministry of Water and Irrigation.
Figure 7: Health Facility Distance to Water Point
To compute water scarcity, the raster layer is cut according to the shape of the selected ward. Then, for each 100 square meter cell, the dashboard calculates the distance to the nearest water point. The risk formula takes into account distance to the nearest water point, and number of people living in the area in that cell.
The formula gives higher weight to population density, versus distance to water points. Higher risk areas have higher risk scores, and a darker red color.
Figure 8: Scarcity Calculation
What Comes Next
To scale and sustain this work, it’s important to maintain the base technology; continue to adapt and iterate on the programmatic approach; and, finally, to identify resources for strengthening capacity and use of the system.
Fortunately, on the first point, the University of Dar-es-Salaam is an exceptionally well-positioned partner and facilitator for this work. UDSM possesses the skills needed to enhance and maintain the DHIS2 back-end, and open-source solution dashboard and application front-end; they also have deep experience and relationships with the Ministry of Water and Irrigation.
As to the second — it’s tempting to believe that, following a successful pilot, scaling is simply a matter of making the tool available to a wider audience. While the overall SEMA project has shown promising outputs in terms of real-time monitoring, additional government resources are likely to be needed in order to sustain and scale the program. Scaling up in phases, with adjustments/revisions based on feedback from DWEs, will reinforce gains that lead to overall success.
Finally, we anticipate that additional resources will be needed to support training and capacity strengthening for additional DWEs and community reporters. As the system becomes further populated with data, it can become a stronger mechanism for community feedback; and an evidence base for ministry planning and response; and a resource for smarter, needs-based investments in Tanzania’s water sector.
Dr. Juma Lungo is a lecturer and researcher at the University of Daresalaam, and a consultant on information systems and software development. The Development Gateway WPMS project team includes: Mark Irura, Diego Dimunzio, Monicah Njonjo, Mauricio Bertoli, Galina Kalvatcheva.
This blog is co-written by Development Gateway’s Aminata Camara, Senior Consultant; Kathryn Alexander, Senior Program Advisor; and MCC‘s Agnieszka Rawa, Managing Director of Data Collaboratives for Local Impact (DCLI). On June 28th, 2021, MCC, USAID, Microsoft, Thinkroom, and Development Gateway will be co-hosting a workshop to share, validate, inform, and build on recent research on
The UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) and Development Gateway (DG) are pleased to release a new report entitled “Decision-Making and Data Use Landscaping: Better Data, Better Decisions - May 2017 to October 2018.” This work examines the role that data plays in supporting key decisions taken by DFID at the strategy, portfolio (sector or country), and programme level. Supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through DG’s Results Data Initiative, the report synthesises in-depth interviews with approximately 60 DFID staff across four country offices, all sector teams, and senior management.
What does “fit-for-purpose” data actually mean? It depends: on who you ask, and what decision is at stake. For governments and development partners – particularly those who rely on data from country systems for program planning and management – much frustration came from perceived redundancies in statistical and administrative data systems.