Why International Development is like Fantasy Football

February 26, 2013
Stephen Davenport

I am Stephen Davenport and this year I took a stab at fantasy football, which is like other fantasy sports (FIFA Soccer, Baseball, etc.), where you select individual players using statistics and form virtual teams that compete each week against other virtual teams in a pseudo league. It’s for sports fanatics.

I was always skeptical on how “fun” that would be given that I played football myself in high school and am naturally hesitant to use pure statistics to predict winners and losers in competitive sports. Even so, I set up a league, read up on the rules, asked around and enlisted 7-8 of my college friends to join my league. As the “commissioner” I held unlimited power. We had a blast, I got crushed.

What I did notice through the course of the season was that it reminded me of what I do, International Development and Technology, in a weird way. I recalled a blog post by Rakesh Rajani of Twaweza “If development were soccer“.

I am a big fan of team building, that everyone has a role to play, and the human chemistry needed in organizations to deliver results and be successful. I always compare things to sports as my colleagues will attest with rolling eyes.

How FF is similar to development

  • The waiver wire: When building a team roster you can pick up and drop players at any time. Whoever looks better on paper you add on your bench even if you never use them (e.g. USAID contracting)
  • The commissioner: Alludes to participatory rule setting but really makes the call the way he/she wants. Entirely driven by the personality of the commissioner. (e.g. In-country partners/donors)
  • Trades: You can make deals with other teams for players. You make those transparent but people have to know where to look. (e.g. Open Data and accessibility)
  • Make your own trophies: You define results and outcomes yourself with or without consultation. (e.g. Everybody…since no one can define what winning looks like)

What works

  • Transparency: All rule changes by teams and the commissioner are public. Even if people don’t catch a league or team change in real time it’s documented.
  • Accountability: Pressure from colleagues? Anyone caught cheating stands a good chance of not getting asked back next year.
  • Game Time Adjustments: Winners have fun, get involved, do their homework, and adjust teams all the time based on the latest news, stats, and opposition.
  • Experimentation: No one game ruins a season. Try different combinations until you get one that works.

My dream team

Using a FIFA Fantasy Soccer 4-4-2 formation, and Argentina’s national team (my wife’s nationality), I think I have the winning formula. The referee would be Owen Barder to make it controversial. The playing pitch would be the OpenGov Hub.

The governing body is the Argentine Football Association (AFA) because it’s totally corrupt and you have to win despite it.

Share This Post

Related from our library

Fertilizer Technical Working Groups Provide Key Insights into Africa’s Fertilizer Sector

From June 2021 to September 2022, Development Gateway: An IREX Venture’s (DG’s) Visualizing Insights on Fertilizer for African Agriculture (VIFAA) program convened 12 Fertilizer Technical Working Groups in 14 countries which have yielded essential information on Africa’s fertilizer sector, including insights on how geopolitical events have impacted the fertilizer sector and what is needed to mitigate resulting threats to food security throughout Africa.

May 4, 2023 Agriculture
The Cashew-IN Platform: An Assessment of the Cashew Sectors in Five Countries (Part 2)

In the first part of this blog series, we discussed the CALM assessment of the cashew data ecosystem, key findings from the assessment, and how DG is using the findings as well as partner and stakeholder feedback to guide the development of the Cashew-IN platform, a website that will facilitate access to and use of data to improve decision-making for policymakers, farmers, and the private sector. In this blog, we will look at the indicators on the Cashew-IN platform and what the data is telling us about the cashew sector more broadly.

April 27, 2023 Agriculture
The Cashew-IN Platform: A Deep Dive on Designing to Meet Stakeholder Needs (Part 1)

The Cashew-IN program, which DG started in partnership with Cultivating New Frontiers in Agriculture in 2020, conducted a landscape assessment of the data in the cashew sectors of five countries: Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Nigeria. The assessment findings will inform the Cashew-IN platform, a website that the program is developing to facilitate use of data in order to improve decision-making for policymakers, farmers, and the private sector. In this blog (part 1 of 2), we explore the assessment process, findings, and how stakeholders plan to use the platform.

April 25, 2023 Agriculture